groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel.Sun" <sun...@apache.org>
Subject Re: About the lazy consensus on Pull Requests
Date Sun, 27 Jan 2019 21:46:39 GMT
Let's have a look at some examples to clarify the "big changes":

1) Removing unnecessary boxing and unboxing modifies a lot of files, it is a
big change but it is just a refactoring, so I think it can apply the lazy
consensus strategy.

2) Supporting switch expression of Java 12 will impact groovy users, it is a
big change and can not apply the lazy consensus strategy.

Agree with me?

Cheers,
Daniel.Sun






-----
Apache Groovy committer 
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me 
Twitter: @daniel_sun 

--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html

Mime
View raw message