If there is willingness to accept contributions in that area then I'd be happy to give it a shot. I would be much happier myself if the tooling, especially IntelliJ, had a better chance of understanding the types, especially when closures are used as arguments, for DGM methods.


On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:08 AM Paul King <paulk@asert.com.au> wrote:
I presume you mean generics wildcards. There are already some uses. Very early on there were some issues with the type checker recognizing some wildcard variants, so we avoided adding them. We have made some fixes but haven't gone back in many cases and updated the DGM methods to see if they can now be improved.

On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:00 AM Daniil Ovchinnikov <daniil.ovchinnikov@jetbrains.com> wrote:
Hi all -

Any plans to add wildcards into DGM methods?

Daniil Ovchinnikov