groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Renumber Groovy 2.6 to 2.9
Date Sun, 20 May 2018 13:11:39 GMT
I’d suggest to keep it simple, go with 2.9.0. 

Sent from my primitive Tricorder

> On 20 May 2018, at 21:50, mg <mgbiz@arscreat.com> wrote:
> 
> What about 2.97 ? Incorporates a JDK 7 reference, and is not too close to 3.0 (Bugfixes
could go into 2.97.1 etc..., so the "7" could be kept).
> 
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> Von: Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk>
> Datum: 20.05.18 12:26 (GMT+01:00)
> An: paulk@asert.com.au, dev@groovy.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Renumber Groovy 2.6 to 2.9
> 
> On Sun, 2018-05-20 at 13:58 +1000, Paul King wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was wondering what people thought about renumbering Groovy 2.6 to 2.9.
> > It is only a subtle change but I think better conveys that it isn't a small
> > step up
> > from 2.5 but rather something just a bit short of 3.
> > 
> 
> If it is to be the last 2.X release why not 2.99 to make it more "in your
> face"?
> 
> -- 
> Russel.
> ==========================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk

Mime
View raw message