From dev-return-4076-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@groovy.apache.org Thu Jan 11 23:14:35 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA205180656 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:14:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A9A0C160C23; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2203D160C13 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:14:34 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 16139 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2018 22:14:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 16129 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2018 22:14:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:14:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 96B6AC1925 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:14:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.485 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.485 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOxBx94Yg6AF for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n5.nabble.com (n5.nabble.com [162.253.133.81]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8B4075F3CC for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n5.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n5.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9487736934EE for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:14:26 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:14:26 -0700 (MST) From: Nathan Harvey To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1515708866606-0.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1515658030243-0.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1515658030243-0.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: About the native-lambda branch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Great work, Daniel. What's will the differences be between closures and lambdas? I love that you can have fine control over closure scoping, but lambdas play very well with functional interfaces, which are very important! -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html