From dev-return-4088-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@groovy.apache.org Fri Jan 12 18:31:30 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD100180621 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:31:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9CF96160C33; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E36C7160C20 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:31:29 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 8875 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2018 17:31:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 8865 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2018 17:31:28 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:31:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 63797C204E for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:31:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.721 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUi1xZfN8B58 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1078F5F24A for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.138] ([195.141.68.118]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LswqM-1eyZGX0MR8-012Vdz for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:31:19 +0100 Subject: Re: About the native-lambda branch To: dev@groovy.apache.org References: <1515658030243-0.post@n5.nabble.com> <1515708866606-0.post@n5.nabble.com> <1515726323882-0.post@n5.nabble.com> <43810210-2365-4C75-AEE5-19AE38785467@selskabet.org> <1515762817579-0.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Jochen Theodorou Message-ID: <06955127-58f5-ceed-9a76-6c92828de39c@gmx.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:31:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1515762817579-0.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hOA5TAWMAeie5GuHdCCtx4rfbGgDQjK2BFylTau9VRB9FUOdz11 Lsep/TsNqL0I4c5jIQLUjNA86aex/O6wgYCvxfPRD9V+207mgJcGrsC6ilemfrFvdfkUsPJ zGXVzZreFyTGg/X6L8FtRpw0G4xHG7dxKpH+S3SwqcVvmeLC0ZvHDL79nq4g6Mfa0e1XOKR PQtueJFY5URx+aath9AmQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:sA+GXxUYL/0=:EaQXofMuZBCo7uXAyBNfNR Jhcc5qj0aLU78HRVUkCQMObe+01zx1YAnykgObg45BTo0Gtwn5g318WtOpNjv8h3LRz86cxqz /UJaALaDf7vBD4bCnceCj19VQnZamZSPrUvynfbIWd2/4Fvc+lZVkqrUVsYcXvsst+186WeAq bY/oTn/KZcIW2eCNt10WmkbAj4+m9CBY5tKwhpp644Qf1Y8oSRXA04AACZPiTkg32VWKYfMsz qB21zb9U6wgotET8JSFhA2a6vVV/ZoG2rVDqo3uHt/7G9x9ITyd7RCXCuRFl5WZYD9j4S7+Ox kwd5P4kuQL/A1QUAIfgGOmy9ityEiNk1QvslyplWEla04gYJSvwpXHqWl0u5YD9pczWB2DPoI 1bkJxZfiAx79tD/H+TgXDEUS8H1fMyTBmyFyyVN3qf8118uVDlUT5H9cfX4fnpcFBAOM00nGH lpisWdp/ZblBwR2MfzimR5gRCalb0NkI3Ui5OKcmqBBRwImn4lTnwHjPO733fyadzFAWa8BCZ E+bqRYFFNOnT30w84kawdGhc+uBjNUoVkMYD4V1YGtUtinom8gTaNQjsG8SlK/wVxFnV+fL+T uqtcJSRV2VmCQKbf1jfu3UZ1JdsT0gLf2XLQNX5teAdF+L2ntuO716cTprw2XCesV2F21DXV6 b33osckmHPZe16jEQhro+KGwbl3YjkcNI6Q9N2Av96euVwA6jBffI8MJt9trS/5S+ZxIpwzsJ dEtXQIBjXr50s5URskINVski6CL9N/MFABiLVn93N5vZH0eYDUgnC+vjAG9KSZqp8uJngASQ1 iEUZgi/MHbLfxIAQjWdtD0QHOFQ6Pb7mH9+Ue4Ht7a1sapetuw= Am 12.01.2018 um 14:13 schrieb Daniel.Sun: > Hi Jesper, > > The bytecode generation for lambda of the current implementation > should be somehow same with javac does, because I reference the ASM code, > which is decomplied from bytecode generated by javac. > > If you have some spare time to contribute, glad to work with you again > ;-) can you give an example where javac creates an inner class at compile time for the lambda? Because I know no such case bye Jochen