groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Inner-project extension methods
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:08:44 GMT
Fair point, Jochen.

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag@gmx.org> wrote:

> On 03.01.2018 07:44, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> [...]
>
>> We can still discuss the syntax, but I'd be interested in seeing one.
>> Although you can start experimenting with an AST transformation.
>>
>> On principle, I think I'm in favor of the idea, but as Paul said in
>> another thread, the devil is always in the details!
>>
>
> An AST transformation is not going to be enough for a full dynamic
> version. Just look at the continuous problems we have with static imports.
> The transform can then not be more as a simple showcase with a naive
> implementation. The actual implementation will differ - a lot.
>
> bye Jochen
>



-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>

Mime
View raw message