groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Theodorou <>
Subject Re: Trying to determine if a change in 2.4.8 was deliberate...
Date Sat, 01 Apr 2017 21:14:30 GMT
On 01.04.2017 20:04, John Wagenleitner wrote:
> I remember looking at this and seeing that the commit that originally
> introduced the check was 2f077109 [1].  Subsequent commits switched to
> CachedClass and later back to Class for the argument type to that method
> but things got out of sync between MethodIndexAction and the local
> MOPIter class leaving the method unused which looked like a regression
> (albeit way back in 1.8) and not intentional.
> I can revert the commit or maybe just remove the skipClass method
> altogether from MOPIter.
> [1]

It is very possible that changes back then introduced something that was 
not intended. But we did built on top of it. I think removing the 
skipClass method would be best.

bye Jochen

View raw message