groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jim northrop <james.b.north...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: GPars 1, 2, and 3
Date Fri, 17 Mar 2017 06:37:18 GMT
if you need more recent gpars documentation, i'm working on v2.0 of it that
you can see here: http://gpars.aws.ie.a9sapp.eu
 the download page does show gpars 2.0 but it's just copies of 1.2.1 that
i've renamed as placeholders.
since jsr-166Y may be dropped there are a number of gpars features that may
disappear, so we're hoping to clarify this issue before summer release.
😊

On 16 March 2017 at 23:13, Jochen Theodorou <blackdrag@gmx.org> wrote:

> On 16.03.2017 22:54, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
>
>> On 14.03.2017 12:06, Russel Winder wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> It might be worth thinking about whether GPars has a real future since
>>> so few people seem to be interested in actively working on it. With
>>> Quasar (Parallel Universe thing not Quasar Framework) there is a
>>> fibers, actors, CSP framework with resources behind it. OK so no proper
>>> dataflow out of the box, but it could be added.
>>>
>>
>> you mean http://www.paralleluniverse.co/quasar/ ?
>> Fibers there work based on agents and bytecode rewriting? CSP I have not
>> seen, but I did not look to closely. License wise it might be ok, since
>> it offers EPL 1.0 dual with GPL3 (the later would not be ok for us).
>>
>> But frankly, if I am right about the fibers, then this part is no option
>> for me. That leaves the CSP part, which I did not see and actors. Is it
>> really worth it then?
>>
>
> found Dataflow, reactive streams and channels now... also that it seems to
> have a dependency on Guava... nothing against Guava itself, but there are
> too many incompatible version going around and it is a big dependency of
> over 1MB
>
> bye Jochen
>
>

Mime
View raw message