groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Theodorou <>
Subject Re: GPars 1, 2, and 3
Date Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:13:47 GMT
On 16.03.2017 22:54, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> On 14.03.2017 12:06, Russel Winder wrote:
> [...]
>> It might be worth thinking about whether GPars has a real future since
>> so few people seem to be interested in actively working on it. With
>> Quasar (Parallel Universe thing not Quasar Framework) there is a
>> fibers, actors, CSP framework with resources behind it. OK so no proper
>> dataflow out of the box, but it could be added.
> you mean ?
> Fibers there work based on agents and bytecode rewriting? CSP I have not
> seen, but I did not look to closely. License wise it might be ok, since
> it offers EPL 1.0 dual with GPL3 (the later would not be ok for us).
> But frankly, if I am right about the fibers, then this part is no option
> for me. That leaves the CSP part, which I did not see and actors. Is it
> really worth it then?

found Dataflow, reactive streams and channels now... also that it seems 
to have a dependency on Guava... nothing against Guava itself, but there 
are too many incompatible version going around and it is a big 
dependency of over 1MB

bye Jochen

View raw message