groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Sun <>
Subject 答复: [VOTE] Apache Groovy Roadmap
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2017 15:00:06 GMT
Hi Jochen,

That’s great!
Paul and Graeme are both afraid of future breaking changes of groovy’s lambda expression,
which is currently based on closure. If we could generate *real* lambda bytecode for LambdaExpression,
groovy’s lambda expression will behave same with Java8’s at runtime??


发件人: Jochen Theodorou [via Groovy]<>
发送时间: 2017年2月7日 22:23
收件人: Daniel Sun<>
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Groovy Roadmap

On 07.02.2017 14:44, Daniel Sun wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
>       It seems that too many choices are a annoying problem, but I
> believe we can conquer it sooner or later ;)
>       BTW, is it possible to keep groovy' lambda expression as it
> is(i.e. groovy closure with lambda syntax) but generate *real* lambda
> bytecode for
> it(

sure, you should make a visitLambdaExpression similar to
visitClosureExpression and change our visitors

bye Jochen

If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
To unsubscribe from [VOTE] Apache Groovy Roadmap, click here<>.

View this message in context:
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at
View raw message