Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA10F200BF9 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:09:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9DC1B160B36; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 19A1B160B2C for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 13:08:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 7418 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2017 12:08:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 7397 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2017 12:08:58 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2017 12:08:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 864E8C043B for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:08:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.472 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.472 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=1.187, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IQTAfKW7I6ql for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9F6EF5F370 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.162.255.23.22.macminivault.com (unknown [162.255.23.22]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAC439CE3AF for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 03:52:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 05:08:43 -0700 (MST) From: Daniel Sun To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1483877323163-5737598.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <5871B5AF.6010503@gmx.org> References: <1483809369447-5737574.post@n5.nabble.com> <5871B5AF.6010503@gmx.org> Subject: Re: About actor syntax for Groovy 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 12:09:00 -0000 Hi Jochen, I'm looking for a new syntax for concurrency programming, which should be able to hide complex for developers. As you said, the actor syntax is not necessary. I agree with you, because it just replaces 'send' method with '<<', but I wish the topic could let us think about the concurrency programming syntax. Cheers, Daniel.Sun -- View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-actor-syntax-for-Groovy-3-tp5737574p5737598.html Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.