+1 if follows the convention mentioned by Andres

On 25 Jan 2017 17:58, "Andres Almiray" <aalmiray@gmail.com> wrote:
Is the "implies" method supposed to work with Groovy Truth or with booleans only?
If the former then this would pose a problem as anyone that has defined an "X implies(Y)" method would have access to =>
If the latter then I guess that may not be a proplem.

Assuming "X implies(Y)" would be the convention for => just like "X plus(Y)" is for +, and so on.


Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

      The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is the
replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576>  ) .

      Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad)

      BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the old
parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new parser
Parrot :)


View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.