groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mario Garcia <mario.g...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About the "implies" operator(GROOVY-2576)
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:28:30 GMT
+1 if follows the convention mentioned by Andres

On 25 Jan 2017 17:58, "Andres Almiray" <aalmiray@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the "implies" method supposed to work with Groovy Truth or with
> booleans only?
> If the former then this would pose a problem as anyone that has defined an
> "X implies(Y)" method would have access to =>
> If the latter then I guess that may not be a proplem.
>
> Assuming "X implies(Y)" would be the convention for => just like "X
> plus(Y)" is for +, and so on.
>
> Cheers,
> Andres
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
> http://jroller.com/aalmiray
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
> --
> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary,
> and those who don't.
> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>       The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is
>> the
>> replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576>  ) .
>>
>>       Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad)
>>
>>       BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the
>> old
>> parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new parser
>> Parrot :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel.Sun
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble
>> .com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html
>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message