groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The priority of .. and . (GROOVY-3240)
Date Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:35:53 GMT
Currently .. and ..< have lower priority than .
Not sure we should revisit that, it would be a useless breaking change.

Integer.metaClass.foo = { delegate + 1 }
assert 3.foo()..4.foo() == 4..5
​
​

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Daniel Sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>       I'm taking a look at  GROOVY-3240
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-3240>  , which was raised by
> me some years ago. I wonder whether .. has higher priority than DOT(.) or
> not.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.
> nabble.com/The-priority-of-and-GROOVY-3240-tp5737831.html
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>

Mime
View raw message