groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Hadfield <m...@hadfield.org>
Subject Re: About the "implies" operator(GROOVY-2576)
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:57:41 GMT
+1 yes, especially if it's overloadable as per the other operators


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>       The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is the
> replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576>  ) .
>
>       Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad)
>
>       BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the old
> parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new parser
> Parrot :)
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.
> nabble.com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
View raw message