groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: About the "implies" operator(GROOVY-2576)
Date Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:40:55 GMT
+1

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mario Garcia <mario.ggar@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 if follows the convention mentioned by Andres
>
> On 25 Jan 2017 17:58, "Andres Almiray" <aalmiray@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is the "implies" method supposed to work with Groovy Truth or with
>> booleans only?
>> If the former then this would pose a problem as anyone that has defined an
>> "X implies(Y)" method would have access to =>
>> If the latter then I guess that may not be a proplem.
>>
>> Assuming "X implies(Y)" would be the convention for => just like "X
>> plus(Y)" is for +, and so on.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andres
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
>> http://jroller.com/aalmiray
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
>> --
>> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator.
>> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary,
>> and those who don't.
>> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Daniel Sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>       The "implies" operator "=>" was suggested many years ago, here is
>>> the
>>> replated JIRA issue( GROOVY-2576
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2576>  ) .
>>>
>>>       Do you want it for Groovy 3? (+1: yes; -1: no; 0: not bad)
>>>
>>>       BTW, recently I have been going through the issues related to the
>>> old
>>> parser, many issues existing for many years do not exist in the new
>>> parser
>>> Parrot :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel.Sun
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-the-implies-operator-GROOVY-2576-tp5738035.html
>>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message