groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About array initializer of Java style for Groovy 3
Date Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:12:49 GMT
I think we should support only explicit array initilization with array type, that is "new int[]
{ 2 }" for compatibility's sake. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 24 Jan 2017, at 09:59, Daniel Sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> or we just support new int[] {1,2,3}  ?
> 
> 
> 
> 在 "Guillaume Laforge [via Groovy]" <ml-node+[hidden email]>,2017年1月24日
16:54写道:
> What happens for def a = { 2 }, is it parsed as a closure or an array initializer?
> 
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Daniel Sun <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi Andres,
>> 
>>        Parrot can parse ` def a = {1, 2, 3}` properly, but it can not parse
>> `{1, 2, 3}`, which is not supported by Java too.
>> 
>>        This is the initial implementation :)
>> https://github.com/danielsun1106/groovy-parser/commit/96e6c923a4d09d48448f8731a314c918ee6c0e7c
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel.Sun
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-array-initializer-of-Java-style-for-Groovy-3-tp5737941p5737944.html
>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Guillaume Laforge
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
> 
> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
> Social: @glaforge / Google+
> 
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/About-array-initializer-of-Java-style-for-Groovy-3-tp5737941p5737945.html
> To unsubscribe from About array initializer of Java style for Groovy 3, click here.
> NAML
> 
> View this message in context: Re: About array initializer of Java style for Groovy 3
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message