groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul King <>
Subject Re: About SimpleHTTPServer
Date Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:59:25 GMT
I don't know whether you would find listing 12.16 from ReGinA useful:

It is based on Jetty rather than but
might provide some useful inspiration:

Also, I don't know whether you need a separate -m switch or whether
you could hook into the existing "listen on port (-l port)"
functionality but modify it to accept a class name.

Cheers, Paul.

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Daniel Sun <> wrote:
> Hi S├ębastien,
>      The SimpleHTTPServer will be implemented with NO 3rd part library, so
> it will not impact existing production systems. In addition, it is
> recommended to be used to provide http service for convenience(such as
> testing WebRTC app). If we want to deploy our static web site, the
> SimpleHTTPServer is not recommended to be used in production :)
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
> --
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at

View raw message