groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jim northrop <james.b.north...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Build fail on JDK9
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:06:15 GMT
Will we be needing any doco changes for GPars 2.0 Russel ?

On 19 December 2016 at 07:34, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:34 +0000, Russel Winder wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:26 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> > > You always forget to give me precise details! 😜
> > > JDK 9 is a very vague context!
> >
> > What is the latest JDK9?
>
> Having actually read the Oracle JDK9 EA licence, I find I (and I
> suspect almost everyone) cannot comply with the terms as stated (as
> opposed to the ones probably intended). I have therefore removed all my
> Oracle JDK9 installs so as to be compliant.
>
> Until Fedora Rawhide has an OpenJDK9 package, I won't be running JDK9
> on that platform. Debian Experimental has an OpenJDK9 package so over
> Christmas I will be installing and using that. So for now OpenJDK8
> only, and hence no Gradle problems. Also no Asciidoctor problem so I
> can build the documentation again.
>
> Once I have both OpenJDK8 and OpenJDK9, I should be able to start work
> on getting GPars 2.0 into a fit state for release.
>
> --
> Russel.
> ============================================================
> =================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:russel.winder@ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

Mime
View raw message