Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: paulk@asert.com.au
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2HCd-__nKt2CBYL-ae+OVRxfpzpUPhHhLCLQ-GwrUTy7ucEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ2HCd-SCt3e4FMkMb1oFi8OEVndnO-f653TDRpek1ohvzy_kA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CC595A9A-EF8C-467C-A183-19626E60CC15@univ-mlv.fr> <SG2PR0301MB19516DCE3800F01D7AFB6B47A3D30@SG2PR0301MB1951.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAJ2HCd8HeBQR2aoag7X-7s0t9puddRFojhUp=bRixdXU15rfPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <SG2PR0301MB195175C95BCC7AC3F59B642AA3D20@SG2PR0301MB1951.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAJ2HCd8x1EF6vBMeHx_=q5e8OB7h_-r8j26eaLGDYNWH9nhpRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <SG2PR0301MB19516380BB8E22ED2AE68265A3D20@SG2PR0301MB1951.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <5806CC8E.2080308@gmx.org> <CADQzvm=Cb28FFwGMb3tEDBAkt6XS5_2112QoSYQ=572D2gz=3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <cf0a93ac-d33f-a9e3-3b55-aeda9b980bef@gmx.org> <1476872589837-5736195.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAJ2HCd-__nKt2CBYL-ae+OVRxfpzpUPhHhLCLQ-GwrUTy7ucEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul King <paulk@asert.com.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:43:01 +1000
Message-ID: <CAMbkE7TN8c5prEyf8sZSYFC1Ty-KWjpZk5ULYJLT+Web3_3LLA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Lambda expression for Groovy 3
To: dev@groovy.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:43:15 -0000

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what I thought too.
> Although there's one :: case that .& doesn't support in Groovy.
> (details escape me at this point as I'm in a hurry to go & grab lunch :D)

I think these are the references you had in mind Guillaume:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7772
https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/287

There is some useful discussion but also a final comment that a bit
more work is required over and above the proposal in that PR.

Cheers, Paul.

> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:23 PM, daniel_sun <realbluesun@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jochen,
>>
>>       I plan to map Java's *::* to Groovy's *.&*, the following code is ok
>> now. What do you think about it?
>>
>> [1, 2, 3].stream().forEach(System.out.&println)          // object method,
>> [1, 2, 3].stream().forEach(System.out::println)
>> [1, 2, 3].stream().forEach(Objects.&requireNonNull) // class method,  [1,
>> 2,
>> 3].stream().forEach(Objects::requireNonNull)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel.Sun
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Lambda-expression-for-Groovy-3-tp5736169p5736195.html
>> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Guillaume Laforge
> Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
> Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform
>
> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
> Social: @glaforge / Google+