Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3E2200BB2 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:03:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 48C49160AF4; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F401160AF1 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 61296 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2016 08:03:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 61286 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2016 08:03:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:03:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1567E186274 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:03:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.702 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Pn9Aqf6C1Kw for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 868A65F22F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.10.10] ([77.177.164.208]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lbujs-1chSaA2gGi-00jKOs for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:03:10 +0200 Subject: Re: An issue about comparing arrays To: dev@groovy.apache.org References: From: Jochen Theodorou Message-ID: <581457BB.6010306@gmx.org> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 10:03:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CF/JP7Z/DsFJkfIl55kQblafPGnzBHY+XMSg6gQfvrt9hh3Z7CJ EbDMK69cazyCIDEfqwU3qBNSKJqbBLTFrIdP8by4vl6GCgQNWLkFMPTsCaYT9XKCPxRG2v7 oZhIT9LmB2UwX8tQB2uNdbFCFkhV1cMluo3/lq9dpbJL3h1FAozmE78RrLT7Ngo+QFwFy+r fIWfX1GJZIMC3ARl4WlEA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:rX1r3b87bTA=:Q0PYSYnq3DLvaCYiTtz6zh NnrdTjJvMihuMTbOwu8983DAOWXKOsuFESNKggWsmmwvodp9aeQOj9OlxKbvir6GyrMImxwMK zA7pjJq89M3Fakgz66fsgCG/qLPUbFn+BXSD5COi9VFrPmTryZHHkzgy+UUG8avPFjqV7mvwK CZVXomks4Smj7f2FVVqUeGkDFGB1pEmxrECOVF+ILCkhnQxfGhZ4Avlf79+V1ZQrj15Me6rqm E+CiP1uD2wZxWoDOa0TsAHixDcVLsTl0drL1rESHCU02RLtwWOWgd2jCOKlGzUlI748hnCOOz TLTSfjMqO2dDxbdklOjg2zijyG/Le88Rl5sVJDKKl1w2Ey1alNDLixBhOc9oZuTuxNZpXcJlG aYo6y8rLYdz+f1+AtbL8eY8KyQO980nEKjs5tPm9kn2qNiTpnO5hmiumWm4DmcfzDgB6buT+N NOd5m/atdMc876LBtih6g45z+uZtabvyphq//Z2Z2PHUK8PRkHm/8JdCa3tWGE/y8M1x10TER YZkB/BZvyTeA+6O8S7dQlef9M0Ye72YzM43b7x4pPGvhQd4mET47iBRLS3f2CcnM6fyrkv5Do 2iJDVCRgEPSJLsLAaYG+oHfDUQxG/dRDtV24aK6PuvIVzbgjjulMNKlDSTOyxyfO4VC1xaNDE w+wD/WAH5kh8I/Jx+Ssqq96OxqKkj2UQ9ljx74eA3FxbH7ij5kl8TClZmR2M2exnVsTCV3CiU T+U23OMHuLu7yviUoReYYzKbHejW+55wb8afxKEQOWxzIbIlJyWme2Yi76dzT63lsNqmdl5ZA bUegxIc archived-at: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:03:24 -0000 On 29.10.2016 04:24, 孙 岚 wrote: > Hi all, > > I found "new int[2]" is equal to "new int[2][]". It is a bug or > feature? that looks like a bug to me... not sure if that is legal in Java,but if I would expect the creation of a 2 elements array of int[] with null values bye Jochen