groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maarten Boekhold <boekh...@gmx.com>
Subject Re: Custom operator for Groovy 3
Date Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:20:35 GMT
What if we look at this as a special kind of method call: in-fix method calls?

Maarten


On October 30, 2016 2:08:07 PM "Daniel.Sun" <realbluesun@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Paolo,
>
>      There are some limitations when we use antlr to define grammar, so the
> backticks are used to distinguish with other operators.
>
>      I saw an answer from Jochen(shown as follow), so I tryied to add this
> experimental feature
>
>      "We always wanted the ability to define an operator through the user in
> Groovy, but so far we haven't gotten around the problems that come along
> with that."
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6485861/is-it-possible-to-define-a-new-operator-in-groovy/10848093#10848093
>
>        BTW, this is a experimental feature and some traps may exist as
> C├ędric said, so I'm not sure it will be added to Groovy 3 ;-)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Custom-operator-for-Groovy-3-tp5736388p5736396.html
> Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Mime
View raw message