groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel.Sun" <>
Subject Re: Custom operator for Groovy 3
Date Sun, 30 Oct 2016 09:28:12 GMT
Hi C├ędric

> We always said we wouldn't fall into the same trap as C++ or Scala, but
> instead allow overriding existing operators.
Could you please expain the trap in details?  Thanks in advance :)

BTW,  I adjusted the priority of custom operators to avoid parentheses in
most cases.


View this message in context:
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at

View raw message