groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel.Sun" <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL]Refine the implementation of LRUCache
Date Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:10:08 GMT
Hi Jochen,

> Could somebody double check the file size? 
943.78k...  but I find groovy is lack of a high performance LRU cache
currently, which is important for Groovy.

> Then of course there is the question why we do not use ConcurrentHashMap 
> instead.... because? 

Because ConcurrentHashMap does not supply any function to remove oldest
element automatically :)


View this message in context:
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at

View raw message