Return-Path: <dev-return-1845-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@groovy.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183])
	by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617AF200AE2
	for <archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io>; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:45:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix)
	id 5FD22160A12; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:45:15 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AEAFC16099F
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:45:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 37173 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2016 06:45:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@groovy.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@groovy.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@groovy.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.groovy.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org
Received: (qmail 37163 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2016 06:45:13 -0000
Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:45:13 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 04FA4C309A
	for <dev@groovy.apache.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:45:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Quarantine-ID: <wrK3COD4MoTo>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up
	entirely of whitespace (char 09 hex): References:
	...QJW34i9A@mail.gmail.com>\n\t\n <57454264.604[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.426
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.426 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id wrK3COD4MoTo for <dev@groovy.apache.org>;
	Fri, 27 May 2016 06:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dimen.winder.org.uk (dimen.winder.org.uk [87.127.116.10])
	by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 491815F4EC
	for <dev@groovy.apache.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:45:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from launcelot (unknown [213.205.252.59])
	by dimen.winder.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 402A6600A72;
	Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:02 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <1464331501.6791.8.camel@winder.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Groovy and Java 9
From: Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk>
To: dev@groovy.apache.org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:45:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5745FE8D.3020801@gmx.org>
References: 
	<CACZ9-KdG6WgpTTuyUuYf5K_TQQrrad5JtS8t6kDko2QJW34i9A@mail.gmail.com>	
 <57454264.6040603@gmx.org> <1464160471.1712.3.camel@winder.org.uk>
	 <5745FE8D.3020801@gmx.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-W/04w6W9ckB2W5ANI/jI"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.2-2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
archived-at: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:45:15 -0000


--=-W/04w6W9ckB2W5ANI/jI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 21:35 +0200, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> [=E2=80=A6]
>=20
> There is ground to suspect that we won=C2=B4t create callsite caching
> helper=C2=A0
> methods at runtime using JDK9 and non-indy mode. Did you maybe check=C2=
=A0
> performance under JDK9 with and without indy? I would be interested
> in=C2=A0
> knowing if you see a bigger difference compared to JDK8
>=C2=A0

I haven't really played with any performance aspects recently. Until
after /dev/summer 2016 (a one day conference not a special device to
bring proper weather to the UK) I really won't have much time to play.
Maybe we should raise this again late-June and give it a go. This would
fit well with me trying to get a GPars 2.0 release out of the door.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder@ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
--=-W/04w6W9ckB2W5ANI/jI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=5/+C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-W/04w6W9ckB2W5ANI/jI--