Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7214B19FA6 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50777 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2016 23:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 50730 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2016 23:56:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 50720 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2016 23:56:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:56:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 83663C0803 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:56:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.3 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uC-mBd2IYQAv for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail223c25-1785.carrierzone.com (mail223c25-1785.carrierzone.com [64.29.147.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 212B45F19B for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:56:40 +0000 (UTC) X-POP-User: keith.suderman@suderman.com Received: from picard-2.home (pool-173-62-62-12.pghkny.fios.verizon.net [173.62.62.12]) by mail223c25-1785.carrierzone.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u2CNuVDR001836 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:56:32 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8C61477A-5456-4B1D-B690-9A5B53E0ADAE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Release 2.5 Beta? X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: Suderman Keith In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:56:30 -0500 Message-Id: <96C5BE75-63F1-4895-825D-5CCCA0365540@cs.vassar.edu> References: <56DBFA6D.8030004@gmx.net> To: dev@groovy.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=ZewkaKlA c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=sppqdbktd/EjMwmfzB9pWw==:117 a=sppqdbktd/EjMwmfzB9pWw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=VVlED5B4AAAA:8 a=K8r6V3UJAAAA:8 a=AuEYyS4-AAAA:8 a=JqEG_dyiAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=SEOLcERtqGHh0j17yDcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=RH98eQFFCsC1vJtyUCEA:9 a=vLJWZSX6HCnD2OxK:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=I1RhmFztGH2oFRFgk88A:9 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010205.56E4ACB0.00AA,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 --Apple-Mail=_8C61477A-5456-4B1D-B690-9A5B53E0ADAE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_55C8B935-E86F-4E48-B1A4-2272FC1C5C92" --Apple-Mail=_55C8B935-E86F-4E48-B1A4-2272FC1C5C92 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Mar 12, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Guillaume Laforge > wrote: >=20 > Let's go with mushroom, for a change :-) +1 >=20 > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM, C=C3=A9dric Champeau = > wrote: >=20 >=20 > 2016-03-12 0:05 GMT+01:00 Nicholas Grealy >: > Looks like it's just you and me, Pascal! >=20 > Just some questions for the broader dev community: > Who can perform the release? - C=C3=A9dric looked like he single = handedly pushed out version 2.4.6 - can we ask him to prepare the 2.5 = beta release? >=20 > Until we've switched to a new release process, it's still easier if I = do it, yes. >=20 > Is there anything outstanding for a 2.5 beta release? - Whoever's = we're waiting on, can we get an update? >=20 > There are lots of outstanding issues, that's why it's a beta. In = particular, the new (exciting!) macro stuff is not documented, nor the = AST matcher complete. It's a super nice feature that deserves polishing. = Plus, there are some decisions to be made with regards to applying the = global `macro` AST xform globally or not, in particular with groovy-all. = We can solve this after the beta, for sure, but we need to think about = it. >=20 > Do we need a VOTE thread for a beta release? >=20 > Yes, it's a release. We can call it "beta", "rc" or "mushroom", it's a = release anyway :) >=20 > Cheers! >=20 >=20 > Kind regards, > Nick >=20 > On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 at 22:52 Nicholas Grealy > wrote: > +1 >=20 >=20 > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:37 Pascal Schumacher > wrote: > Hello everybody, >=20 > as far as I remember there was wide support for releasing a 2.5 beta = in > the "Release 2.4.6 and 2.5.0-beta?" discussion. >=20 > The release announcement for 2.4.6 contained the sentence "... be > prepared for a 2.5.0-beta release soon!". Tomorrow that will be two > weeks ago, so I think we should make some plans when we start the > release vote and who will be able to serve as a release manager. >=20 > What do you think? >=20 > Cheers, > Pascal >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President > Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet >=20 > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge / Google+ = ------------------------------ Research Associate Department of Computer Science Vassar College Poughkeepsie, NY --Apple-Mail=_55C8B935-E86F-4E48-B1A4-2272FC1C5C92 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
On Mar 12, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Guillaume = Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> wrote:

Let's go with mushroom, for a change = :-)

+1


On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM, = C=C3=A9dric Champeau <cedric.champeau@gmail.com> wrote:


2016-03-12 0:05 GMT+01:00 = Nicholas Grealy <nickgrealy@gmail.com>:
Looks = like it's just you and me, Pascal!

Just some questions for the broader dev = community:
  • Who can perform the release? = - C=C3=A9dric looked like he single handedly pushed out = version 2.4.6 - can we ask him to prepare the 2.5 beta release?

Until we've switched to a new = release process, it's still easier if I do it, yes.
 
  • Is there anything outstanding for a 2.5 beta release? - = Whoever's we're waiting on, can we get an = update?

There are lots of outstanding = issues, that's why it's a beta. In particular, the new (exciting!) macro = stuff is not documented, nor the AST matcher complete. It's a super nice = feature that deserves polishing. Plus, there are some decisions to be = made with regards to applying the global `macro` AST xform globally or = not, in particular with groovy-all. We can solve this after the beta, = for sure, but we need to think about it. 

  • Do we need a VOTE = thread for a beta release?

Yes, it's a = release. We can call it "beta", "rc" or "mushroom", it's a release = anyway :)

Cheers! 


Kind regards,
Nick

On = Mon, 7 Mar 2016 at 22:52 Nicholas Grealy <nickgrealy@gmail.com> wrote:

+1


On = Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:37 Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumacher@gmx.net> wrote:
Hello everybody,

as far as I remember there was wide support for releasing a 2.5 beta = in
the "Release 2.4.6 and 2.5.0-beta?" discussion.

The release announcement for 2.4.6 contained the sentence "... be
prepared for a 2.5.0-beta release soon!". Tomorrow that will be two
weeks ago, so I think we should make some plans when we start the
release vote and who will be able to serve as a release manager.

What do you think?

Cheers,
Pascal




--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge / Google+

------------------------------
Research Associate
Department of Computer = Science
Vassar College
Poughkeepsie, NY

= --Apple-Mail=_55C8B935-E86F-4E48-B1A4-2272FC1C5C92-- --Apple-Mail=_8C61477A-5456-4B1D-B690-9A5B53E0ADAE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJW5KyuAAoJEObyVxze/o3A8hgH/2FUUVdDUuXzKXMB7HBc2OM8 Z+CIC8fyz85OMamban5mNwBEWUIoV2W7I6C04lDpY1+G+sVRMeqnzcU/8gmw9Ila Po+sedDK0PbfZX5mg6MrU6OjhZYTs/NtjkJUWK8kiCewKPPGRj3B8FNZSkOiFblg w4WdhueV9sMsRg/nOT1uUT3IRa1F5r/MJk9EkXeS9GCbuf6RCugjiMSOXrUFZvmT dQcn/0PdnQH4aXoFtyzJJrXYpxwsYwWTKmFZUuH+XtuYN1ABXmygabrNBvg7K0FC YxB276RsdUnNGM4YtKIj6/gRFAbjRV0Zmx++c5NnaJXObX71FJUb42BnaSs5eC8= =Cw87 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_8C61477A-5456-4B1D-B690-9A5B53E0ADAE--