Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB7EA18875 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 44424 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2016 09:27:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 44382 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2016 09:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 44372 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2016 09:27:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:27:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0D95718048C for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:27:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.511 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.511 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RHRMJz9wDrGE for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com (mail-io0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 97A295FB5F for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z135so145458123iof.0 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:27:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=uDTy3sZiyZzWvRBpr6TFoTYVy4UldEXQNTlMIEYYs1w=; b=onWYOWj3Xyyen/rqPFzPem1O3vdRMA25frGTpRdThNqAuZjFCXwgigyAxcWb0U4QzS lV90TlNWUIuFr7u5qPg8RjLPg5QWkjHMZg9zqe3rww5fBTDma/tbidclWOsgLsx0w6S8 ykhF7zPDOBFp2vbtYms/wdxxONAvGTq8UhF7W+x974zwOjj/5gglTL51vcd+KXqpm3z7 R7pB6DfV+1pWbsoO/N/3YEkoOjbRYDc34HgpImirDcM9X1zvCJIHxPk4qMnGnvj+Gw7R Rbj2E8JdWY4pQZRSsqodsXFObRLncFCBbYyqJqL7dK4sU+vV1kc+oMP76MkMoFnfTIAV 8gRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=uDTy3sZiyZzWvRBpr6TFoTYVy4UldEXQNTlMIEYYs1w=; b=FfjoKCZp5MWyvEhrzOLMyJ+akI4cvmbwVY7qgZwxfcI1sh7O+pMYyj3rtywOGIPUHu pN1Ylc5SKh0zjRKDdm7DXU1WQNHMghC2MvsuJYBAlehrmvDVso6QftB0JtN9Drpbq0Pb QZeps0tn/j8VR/JLIJEMKwz6aTXk54c9z3sch6vDgxEObmVVN2guquwqn68QL5MxBs0S rn7y4wEckFILksp0QnWhsrMVf0EAWLdqVh2soVELeVnY11w49mhK0da5ygw1z5XV1rlD 8Ar5cG/eLF9GARxVWni8ZRDvvTpK9/pQUWNL+eItl9mStLgDOnIaWwf6Xnp9NkPd1pnp 4hNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSrIDTYA0iS30u8LGMy87o3oKb+86H9eg9JOz6aJuPhBkdBMiLVRApPSHbuAhJn3tEx1UelAdlb0r6V+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.130.89 with SMTP id e86mr11537151iod.23.1456565216475; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.79.83.133 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 01:26:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1456562901242-5731443.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <8BDB9669-7BE0-41B8-A67B-72132661BFFC@selskabet.org> <1456562901242-5731443.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:26:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GitHub] groovy pull request: Link to MrHaki's blog in TupleConstructor jav... From: jim northrop To: dev@groovy.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ec87e5203e3052cbd0439 --001a113ec87e5203e3052cbd0439 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 was thinking of the same problem with our http://gpars.website. Do we include code samples or not ? or only links to external sites ? i like the idea of "live" code fragments within the doc.s that are compiled/tested as a part of document generation. this guarantees that code in our docs works as stated. Users can then cut-n-paste with assurance. On 27 February 2016 at 09:48, mrhaki wrote: > I think it is better to have very complete documentation at GroovyDoc > level, > without the need to follow external links. My experience with the Ratpack > Javadoc documentation is that with all example code and snippets included > at > Javadoc level that it is very easy to use as reference. > > It is no problem to use the snippets from my blog in the documentation. > > I like Guillaume's mention that the code could even be tested if it is > included in the GroovyDoc, which makes at least sure the code works. > > In the nearby future I certainly want to contribute to adding snippets to > the existing Groovydoc sources. > > Hubert Klein Ikkink > @mrhaki > www.mrhaki.com > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Re-GitHub-groovy-pull-request-Link-to-MrHaki-s-blog-in-TupleConstructor-jav-tp5731382p5731443.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --001a113ec87e5203e3052cbd0439 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
was thinking of the same problem with our http://gpars.website. Do we include code samp= les or not ? or only links to external sites ? i like the idea of "liv= e" code fragments within the doc.s=C2=A0 that are compiled/tested as a= part of document generation. this guarantees that code in our docs works a= s stated. Users can then cut-n-paste with assurance.

On 27 February 2016 at 0= 9:48, mrhaki <h.kleinikkink@gmail.com> wrote:
I think it is better to have very complete docume= ntation at GroovyDoc level,
without the need to follow external links.=C2=A0 My experience with the Rat= pack
Javadoc documentation is that with all example code and snippets included a= t
Javadoc level that it is very easy to use as reference.

It is no problem to use the snippets from my blog in the documentation.

I like Guillaume's mention that the code could even be tested if it is<= br> included in the GroovyDoc, which makes at least sure the code works.

In the nearby future I certainly want to contribute to adding snippets to the existing Groovydoc sources.

Hubert Klein Ikkink <mrhaki>
@mrhaki
www.= mrhaki.com




--
View this message in context: http://groov= y.329449.n5.nabble.com/Re-GitHub-groovy-pull-request-Link-to-MrHaki-s-blog-= in-TupleConstructor-jav-tp5731382p5731443.html
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--001a113ec87e5203e3052cbd0439--