groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Preparing for a release
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:51:32 GMT
No objections either.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Paul King <paulk@asert.com.au> wrote:

> Any objections to Chris' request? The Jira he referred to is a small
> backwards compatible enhancement (rather than bug fix). We'd normally
> keep this for new releases but it does open up much nicer Spring
> integration options, so I am not too worried about back-porting this
> one.
>
> Other opinions?
>
> Cheers, Paul.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:02 AM, John Wagenleitner
> <john.wagenleitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > I think the file you might be looking for is:
> >
> >     src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/StringGroovyMethods.java
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pascal Schumacher
> > <pascalschumacher@gmx.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
> >>
> >> If you like to contribute code to groovy open a jira ticket and send us
> a
> >> pull request.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Pascal
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 16.02.2016 um 10:18 schrieb jim northrop:
> >>
> >> Hi Pascal
> >> could you pls point me to where i can donate a tiny piece of
> >> String.metadata function ?
> >>
> >> thx
> >> jim
> >>
> >> On 16 February 2016 at 08:12, Pascal Schumacher <
> pascalschumacher@gmx.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 by
> reverting as
> >>> Shils and John suggested in the discussion of
> >>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253
> >>>
> >>> Am 15.02.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Cédric,
> >>>>
> >>>> great news. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I think before https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742
> should
> >>>> be resolved, by either applying
> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253 or
> >>>> reverting
> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/fae29119a1102393ae5d1645c3fc1e06547b0ad8
> >>>>
> >>>> If nobody more qualified offers his opinion on how to handle this I
> >>>> would just revert, so we can release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Pascal
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 15.02.2016 um 10:45 schrieb Cédric Champeau:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As promised, I will try to find some time to perform a release this
> >>>>> week. The last one is months ago already, and even if we had decided
> to
> >>>>> migrate to a smoother process, nobody managed to made the
> modifications yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As such and if nobody disagrees, I will perform a release this week
> >>>>> using the "old" incubating process.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please backport every fix you think is worth having on the 2.4.x
> branch
> >>>>> asap.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet <http://restlet.com>

Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts>

Mime
View raw message