groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jim northrop <james.b.north...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Preparing for a release
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:48:04 GMT
Be glad to open a JIRA - once i learn how ;-}
must do some homework !
thanx
jim

On 16 February 2016 at 19:36, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumacher@gmx.net>
wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
>
> If you like to contribute code to groovy open a jira ticket and send us a
> pull request.
>
> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
> Am 16.02.2016 um 10:18 schrieb jim northrop:
>
> Hi Pascal
> could you pls point me to where i can donate a tiny piece of
> String.metadata function ?
>
> thx
> ​jim
> ​
>
> On 16 February 2016 at 08:12, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumacher@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 by reverting
>> as Shils and John suggested in the discussion of
>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253
>>
>> Am 15.02.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
>>
>>> Hi Cédric,
>>>
>>> great news. :)
>>>
>>> I think before https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 should
>>> be resolved, by either applying
>>> <https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253>
>>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253 or reverting
>>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/fae29119a1102393ae5d1645c3fc1e06547b0ad8
>>>
>>> If nobody more qualified offers his opinion on how to handle this I
>>> would just revert, so we can release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Pascal
>>>
>>> Am 15.02.2016 um 10:45 schrieb Cédric Champeau:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> As promised, I will try to find some time to perform a release this
>>>> week. The last one is months ago already, and even if we had decided to
>>>> migrate to a smoother process, nobody managed to made the modifications yet.
>>>>
>>>> As such and if nobody disagrees, I will perform a release this week
>>>> using the "old" incubating process.
>>>>
>>>> Please backport every fix you think is worth having on the 2.4.x branch
>>>> asap.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message