groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jim northrop <james.b.north...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Preparing for a release
Date Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:48:57 GMT
Hurrah ! Thank YOU John !
thx jim

On 16 February 2016 at 21:02, John Wagenleitner <john.wagenleitner@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> I think the file you might be looking for is:
>
>     src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/StringGroovyMethods.java
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
> pascalschumacher@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
>>
>> If you like to contribute code to groovy open a jira ticket and send us a
>> pull request.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Pascal
>>
>>
>> Am 16.02.2016 um 10:18 schrieb jim northrop:
>>
>> Hi Pascal
>> could you pls point me to where i can donate a tiny piece of
>> String.metadata function ?
>>
>> thx
>> ​jim
>> ​
>>
>> On 16 February 2016 at 08:12, Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumacher@gmx.net
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 by reverting
>>> as Shils and John suggested in the discussion of
>>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253
>>>
>>> Am 15.02.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Pascal Schumacher:
>>>
>>>> Hi Cédric,
>>>>
>>>> great news. :)
>>>>
>>>> I think before https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742
>>>> should be resolved, by either applying
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/253 or reverting
>>>> https://github.com/apache/groovy/commit/fae29119a1102393ae5d1645c3fc1e06547b0ad8
>>>>
>>>> If nobody more qualified offers his opinion on how to handle this I
>>>> would just revert, so we can release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Pascal
>>>>
>>>> Am 15.02.2016 um 10:45 schrieb Cédric Champeau:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> As promised, I will try to find some time to perform a release this
>>>>> week. The last one is months ago already, and even if we had decided
to
>>>>> migrate to a smoother process, nobody managed to made the modifications
yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> As such and if nobody disagrees, I will perform a release this week
>>>>> using the "old" incubating process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please backport every fix you think is worth having on the 2.4.x
>>>>> branch asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message