groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thibault Kruse <tibokr...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Roadmap for 2.5?
Date Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:11:24 GMT
yes, thx.

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Keegan Witt <keeganwitt@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you meant https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7569
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Thibault Kruse <tibokruse@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I had created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-756 for
>> this. I can try adding use-cases there.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Cédric Champeau
>> <cedric.champeau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I'm not sure about the changes to power asserts. For simple expressions,
>> > this shouldn't be much of a problem, however things are not always that
>> > simple, so adding information like types or hashcode may easily become
>> > unreadable. I would suggest to create a proposal (spec?) with some
>> > examples,
>> > with the current output and the new output, for a good number of use
>> > cases.
>> > This would at least help me making my mind.
>> >
>> > 2015-11-01 12:23 GMT+01:00 Thibault Kruse <tibokruse@googlemail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> Not sure if anyone else cares, but I would still like to propose the
>> >> changes to the power assert (more verbose type information).
>> >> See
>> >>
>> >> http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Should-PowerAsserts-be-more-verbose-td5727255.html
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Cédric Champeau
>> >> <cedric.champeau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I think this should be 3.0.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2015-11-01 11:37 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sounds worth a 2.5 with all this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What do you think of the Java 8 related syntax elements?
>> >> >> More for 2.6, or even 3.0?
>> >> >> (but we need to decide which ones we want to address and how anyway)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Cédric Champeau
>> >> >> <cedric.champeau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> At least, releasing a first beta shouldn't be too hard. There
are
>> >> >>> basically 3 things I'd like to see in 2.5:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> - the new macro stuff, including the AST matcher, which is
still
>> >> >>> WIP,
>> >> >>> but
>> >> >>> ready to test
>> >> >>> - a new sandoxing based on what I described in a blog post
[1].
>> >> >>> This
>> >> >>> is
>> >> >>> not implemented.
>> >> >>> - the global flag on @ASTTest to enable it only in tests.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cédric
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> [1] http://melix.github.io/blog/2015/03/sandboxing.html
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> 2015-11-01 11:23 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com>:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Hi Pascal,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Pascal Schumacher
>> >> >>>> <pascalschumacher@gmx.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Hello everybody,
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> when do we plan to release Groovy 2.5?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> That's a good question, but I think we should decide first
what we
>> >> >>>> want
>> >> >>>> to put in this release :-)
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> Guillaume Laforge
>> >> >>>> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
>> >> >>>> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
>> >> >>>> Social: @glaforge / Google+
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Guillaume Laforge
>> >> >> Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
>> >> >> Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/
>> >> >> Social: @glaforge / Google+
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message