Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB37F18F5F for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13177 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2015 14:05:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 13130 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2015 14:05:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13115 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2015 14:05:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:05:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B3A0B1809E0 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:05:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycWQ-m0kEq3M for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (mail-ob0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 530132118F for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obctp1 with SMTP id tp1so41492267obc.2 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EQ+Hppvcs/9Aqx2WDq+qxGKkMXmm/KMXgB0yPtHSJoc=; b=Jcjzbcg6RAMdE3nmIRMxV5/shSowfvFepKLgVYDwdJWlyMlJ3+ncXDUDkTXOPdRk1N QgP2QcN5+N/0518G5Y0g6EAyHdGbxN/OuS7E6o6xNpcf0iaH3Kc7omD5WNgGQdWfw43s R1Z4RKueRqTZYMyGMrmQ8DFSRUNGJoq2eHe44d6wjB7zvnsZoIORWhHBMVZELt3J7jwB 5L81r1MKjruvUWwYgosLHucpSaAOjTfhA2ububLbDyLahRgWG9MoQySUBH88WeVnAmvL DK3cXgsaHQw1fgWEoB5W+xnMF5FkfRs2XtPqTIUWFEsz4kOYixsXN9yzNrQaJI8F5o51 iksA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.35.129 with SMTP id h1mr11169942oej.59.1445522742700; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.84.193 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:05:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:05:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Graduation resolution (was: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Groovy from the incubator) From: Guillaume Laforge To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184c7a97f18e0522b1fd1b --089e01184c7a97f18e0522b1fd1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We should be good now, resolutions updated in the initial thread. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Laforge > wrote: > > ...charged with the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming > > language project, to enable developers to develop programs in Groovy as > an > > alternative and complementary approach to using the Java language on the > > Java platform.... > > Works but maybe "charged with the evolution and maintenance of the > Groovy programming language" would be good enough? > > >... There was a remark asking about committers, since we have committers > which > > aren't PMC members. > > So I figured I could just name them for reference and recognition. > > Should I remove them?.. > > I think so, such board resolutions only include PMC members. > > > ...Going forward (once we're happy with the wording), how should we > proceed > > with the changes? > > Is it just about mentioning that in the voting thread?.. > > Yes that's fine, I just wanted to avoid polluting that thread with > discussions. > > -Bertrand > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Social: @glaforge / Google+ --089e01184c7a97f18e0522b1fd1b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We should be good now, resolutions updated in the initial = thread.

On T= hu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache= .org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...charged with the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programmin= g
> language project, to enable developers to develop programs in Groovy a= s an
> alternative and complementary approach to using the Java language on t= he
> Java platform....

Works but maybe "charged with the evolution and maintenance of the
Groovy programming language" would be good enough?

>... There was a remark asking about committers, since we have committer= s which
> aren't PMC members.
> So I figured I could just name them for reference and recognition.
> Should I remove them?..

I think so, such board resolutions only include PMC members.

> ...Going forward (once we're happy with the wording), how should w= e proceed
> with the changes?
> Is it just about mentioning that in the voting thread?..

Yes that's fine, I just wanted to avoid polluting that thread with disc= ussions.

-Bertrand



--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer= & PMC member
Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet
--089e01184c7a97f18e0522b1fd1b--