Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:29:57 +0300
From: Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org>
To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Graduation resolution (was: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Groovy
 from the incubator)
Message-ID: <20151022182957.GD28170@tpx>
References: 
 <CAEWfVJnxqQ8KXRScp7OkhJqr1KoouzD2rspK76wXoVw4iXmfxA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEWfVJnxqQ8KXRScp7OkhJqr1KoouzD2rspK76wXoVw4iXmfxA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)


--0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ah, I didn't see this thread on time, so here's copy-paste of my comment fr=
om
the vote thread:

Let's get rid of=20

"RESOLVED, that should the need arise for project-specific bylaws, that the
Apache Groovy PMC be tasked with the creation of such bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the Apache Groovy
Project; and be it further"

as creating project-special bylaws shouldn't be a requirement for a new PMC.
ASF bylaws are fine for pretty much all of them. There was a lengthy discus=
sion
about it on comdev the other day.

Thanks,
  Cos

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:29AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Here are my comments about the proposed board resolution, let's fix it
> in this thread.
>=20
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> > ,...to enable
> > the creation of software using domain-driven design principles, and the
> > realization of this through the naked objects architectural pattern,..
>=20
> That's not Groovy, probably a copy/paste from Isis?
>=20
> > ...RESOLVED, that the Apache Groovy Project be and hereby is responsibl=
e for
> > the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming language; and b=
e it
> > further..
>=20
> "the evolution and maintenance..." is what you want in that first
> paragraph probably.
>=20
> > ...As well as the following committers...
>=20
> Board resolutions don't list committers. The PMC is of course free to
> make those folks committers on the new TLP right away.
>=20
> -Bertrand

--0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlYpKyUACgkQenyFlstYjhK5BgEA3K5gt8KknScSCB+KKBv6893l
d2ZROSCv77iOKCkOoegBAJT2tlgfxPlA2VE5dFWjLSBPQsi2YuOTT8cBKuk7ibWG
=zvNt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH--