Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87A4B18CA0 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1091 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2015 18:59:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 1049 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2015 18:59:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1039 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2015 18:59:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D0EC7C0711 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g7fdVhd5mo68 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.166]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 05B4D439C9 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.225]) by resqmta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id VWzA1r0084s37d401Wzl7o; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:45 +0000 Received: from tinybb.boudnik.org ([24.130.135.131]) by resomta-po-01v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id VWzk1r00R2qGB6001WzlSs; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:45 +0000 Received: by tinybb.boudnik.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 685B9974; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:59:48 -0700 From: Konstantin Boudnik To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [mentors] experimental graduation maturity assessment in view of graduating Groovy Message-ID: <20151015185948.GM16172@boudnik.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LqbCLdmouU4wLANe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Organization: It's something of 'Cos User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1444935585; bh=E+0JlKhVhEf+lliuUl/3bXdkOodD0isYeE8D1REIB7g=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Pckm9ExleLE5TU3vqMsFMLnmaZCuFUTEuy6ueCGHD+AD008oxA6ywFFmxkI8B9IB4 roVm3F0d6T2QY7G2kWrucW9zinh5jwbACk+M3EDNdvvLq/NjY0a0x0VspI87zsWRfO fZWCdonp40YeU6MhJy0T0b5RHpetOxb1mMlRaelDvVcY9s1OvWVKG2JOpaCXmkhy2B YoE+155GyLD1g5H0h7a9MZp6k+FJvrNCWmprXJhSo7S6JNv3mKzYStapVrDaxa0wYo s1Dl73IXbf1ffypmrYglHHvtPxd1Hk5SGezHEj1BS8ubKexvkuk6uXM+VqCOLgK2CO a1ql8ZS9oOTIg== --LqbCLdmouU4wLANe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:52PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:58 AM, C=C3=A9dric Champeau > wrote: > > ...I like the idea of having concrete, non > > subjective criteria for graduating, even if it could mean in our case t= hat > > graduating would be "stricter".... >=20 > We're down to 4 TODOs already, and all of them look quite easy to fix. Looks like 3, actually, and the rest seems to be in order! Last time we did it on the project website, but having this in the source code is even bette= r, IMO! Thanks a lot for taking a lead on this! Cos --LqbCLdmouU4wLANe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlYf96MACgkQVO98chmHa+baYwEAmwxj7np3PgQUevt9HYjUz6tN +0MmkAUneuqGF7TAQF8A/1MRsGWTb2U4UzQPYM437Yon/7CQwQrxcTEiR7Td7it9 =66N0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LqbCLdmouU4wLANe--