groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul King <>
Subject Re: [mentors] experimental graduation maturity assessment in view of graduating Groovy
Date Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:52:33 GMT
Guillaume is fixing a few of the missing links on the home page.

Also, wrt:

> ==== CS10
> _The project maintains a public list of its contributors who have decision power -- the
project's PMC (Project Management Committee) consists of those contributors._
> TODO, I don't think that list exists but it will eventually be at
> once the project graduates.

There is this page here:

We didn't spell out PMC/PPMC on that page. If we did, would that be
what is expected?

> [...] I'm not familiar with Gradle but I suppose there's a build option to list them?

$ gradlew dependencies

gives a fairly comprehensive list of dependencies including build.tool


On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<> wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Cédric Champeau
> <> wrote:
>> Bertrand wrote:
>>> TODO: redirects to, do
>>> we plan on keeping it like that?
>> ...My vision to this, what we
>> might do is using groovy.a.o for *development of Groovy itself*, while
>> would be the user facing site....
> That sounds good to me, I moved that info to CO10 and updated CD20 to
> mention the "fork me on github" banner. Note that that banner is not
> visible for me using Firefox Developer Edition 43.0a2 (2015-10-14).
>> LC20
>>> TODO: do we have a documented verification of that? JIRA ticket?
>> Apart from using Rat, no, I don't think we have. But I think it adresses
>> LC30. We don't have any dependency which is not OSS or not approved...
> do we have, or can we create a jira ticket or similar page that
> documents all the the current dependencies? I'm not familiar with
> Gradle but I suppose there's a build option to list them?
>> RE40
>> ...Votes and announcements explicitly refer to those binaries as convenience
>> binaries...
> Ok, I have updated that and removed the TODO.
>> QU30
>> We have, but not linked from top-level
>> page or menu....
> I don't think that page explains how to report security issues. A link
> to would be sufficient.
> -Bertrand

View raw message