groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Graduation resolution (was: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Groovy from the incubator)
Date Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:46:42 GMT
Le 22/10/15 13:45, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit :
> Le 22/10/15 12:23, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...charged with the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming
>>> language project, to enable developers to develop programs in Groovy as an
>>> alternative and complementary approach to using the Java language on the
>>> Java platform....
>> Works but maybe "charged with the evolution and maintenance of the
>> Groovy programming language" would be good enough?
>>
>>> ... There was a remark asking about committers, since we have committers which
>>> aren't PMC members.
>>> So I figured I could just name them for reference and recognition.
>>> Should I remove them?..
>> I think so, such board resolutions only include PMC members.
>>
>>> ...Going forward (once we're happy with the wording), how should we proceed
>>> with the changes?
>>> Is it just about mentioning that in the voting thread?..
>> Yes that's fine, I just wanted to avoid polluting that thread with discussions.
> I was wondering if it would not have been a good idea to ask mentors if
> they want to be part of the PMC. I would decline the offer, but some
> other might want to be part of the game. Of course, the PMC can vote in
> some of the mentors later on if needed. It's just a question...
>
Ah, seems like Cedric asked the mentors in another trhead : all is good
then ;-)

Thanks !

Mime
View raw message