groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Graduation resolution (was: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Groovy from the incubator)
Date Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:45:24 GMT
Le 22/10/15 12:23, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...charged with the evolution and maintenance of the Groovy programming
>> language project, to enable developers to develop programs in Groovy as an
>> alternative and complementary approach to using the Java language on the
>> Java platform....
> Works but maybe "charged with the evolution and maintenance of the
> Groovy programming language" would be good enough?
>
>> ... There was a remark asking about committers, since we have committers which
>> aren't PMC members.
>> So I figured I could just name them for reference and recognition.
>> Should I remove them?..
> I think so, such board resolutions only include PMC members.
>
>> ...Going forward (once we're happy with the wording), how should we proceed
>> with the changes?
>> Is it just about mentioning that in the voting thread?..
> Yes that's fine, I just wanted to avoid polluting that thread with discussions.

I was wondering if it would not have been a good idea to ask mentors if
they want to be part of the PMC. I would decline the offer, but some
other might want to be part of the game. Of course, the PMC can vote in
some of the mentors later on if needed. It's just a question...


Mime
View raw message