Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 811DB187F7 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6961 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2015 18:04:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 6918 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2015 18:04:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6908 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2015 18:04:26 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:04:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B0FA6C095F for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:04:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQnegyOtv4gt for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 480F8453C8 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oigz2 with SMTP id z2so8101907oig.1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5fNsFSPtjkh05y6Res06G+LGzCgv20M4jC5M0D6deMQ=; b=Ye/3mlNl4Qd+pTT+bKZkSKsB/1++PrS1cTl6lWn9brTSZPkGHUGRHNQAKN/gi6KCei nPenwzS7Dil3LjIIQfHSmvy2JwTcJQbbY/jddFDkXL0hMcc31OLG7obPqkPonbAheizw ++36URR3haw9M/Prh3u2b2L1jA5jW2gkHUAFYq4MDrQACrBYwlFAmBLBUjmIcFd7OyAc WwcCVGBjT7Y4YrGkFDHXktnTgAFBPXY3BCPPep7yZb7Gp1+1FYr8VSuyjHeC6u0Ktnth vjK1Ta8JjNUcHlm0g7anfPG1xn87MUsxB+aEgvDDiLR+f87On+doBOmMCEv6CvF5g09s sB7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.199.34 with SMTP id jh2mr8918568obc.48.1434045808382; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.86.36 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.86.36 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:03:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5579C7F3.2080508@gmx.net> References: <556F28EF.9090507@gmx.net> <5574B080.9040301@gmx.net> <5579C7F3.2080508@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:03:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: commits@groovy.incubator.apache.org From: Guillaume Laforge To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1ccd600197a051841cf94 --e89a8ff1ccd600197a051841cf94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks! Le 11 juin 2015 19:40, "Pascal Schumacher" a =C3=A9crit : > I have just created a infra ticket to ask for this to be done: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-9802 > > Am 08.06.2015 um 12:01 schrieb Guillaume Laforge: > > For me it really make sense to separate both, otherwise, one or the other > list is useless. > > 2015-06-07 23:01 GMT+02:00 C=C3=A9dric Champeau : > >> I don't really care. It works for me in both cases :) >> >> 2015-06-07 22:58 GMT+02:00 Pascal Schumacher : >> >>> I would actually also prefer two different list. >>> >>> What do the other commiters think? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Pascal >>> >>> >>> Am 04.06.2015 um 03:12 schrieb Roman Shaposhnik: >>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Guillaume Laforge >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Perhaps it's just routing commits messages to commits, and have only >>>>> JIRA >>>>> emails to notifications? >>>>> >>>> This seems like a great approach! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Roman. >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Guillaume Laforge > Groovy Project Manager > Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > Social: @glaforge / Google+ > > > > --e89a8ff1ccd600197a051841cf94 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks!

Le=C2=A011 juin 2015 19:40, "Pascal Schumac= her" <pascalschumacher@= gmx.net> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
=20 =20 =20
I have just created a infra ticket to ask for this to be done:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/custo= mer/portal/1/INFRA-9802

Am 08.06.2015 um 12:01 schrieb Guillaume Laforge:
For me it really make sense to separate both, otherwise, one or the other list is useless.

2015-06-07 23:01 GMT+02:00 C=C3=A9dric Champeau <cedric.champeau@gmail.com>:
I don't really care. It works for me in bo= th cases :)

2015-06-07 22:58 GMT+02:00 Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumacher@gmx.net= >:
I would actually also prefer two different list.

What do the other commiters think?

Thanks,
Pascal


Am 04.06.2015 um 03:12 schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps it's just routing commits message= s to commits, and have only JIRA
emails to notifications?
This seems like a great approach!

Thanks,
Roman.





--
Guillaume Laforge
Groovy Project Manager
Product Ninja & Advocate at Restlet


--e89a8ff1ccd600197a051841cf94--