Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1362B174B5 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62464 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2015 19:28:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-groovy-dev-archive@groovy.apache.org Received: (qmail 62433 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2015 19:28:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@groovy.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57478 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2015 19:27:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pascalschumacher@gmx.net designates 212.227.17.22 as permitted sender) Message-ID: <552C1886.2060801@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:27:02 +0200 From: Pascal Schumacher User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@groovy.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Incubation] status References: <55224B65.8010401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CtyQQR4a6JHV7tHoHFhzBW3sR5SjcS2xHSj4Wy9xqlt6h+VlqqB OFXt33gkZFtqlIRiBlAUFiiOGmumQS5Tv75+IVhkVa0yXf0L12mh8bn0gQULP1ciPjwBQHw Jj8uuJq5UaMwoBvvrF8CaQuE+r7G74386Qwhm7rgg6QR783nXWwv6PBTgk9P+TpY2TLw7AS S4i2eQOtqpHDAzzm7oKrA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So what are we waiting for? :) Anything I can do to help? -Pascal Am 06.04.2015 um 18:31 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Cédric Champeau > wrote: >> I don't really understand the difference between "importing the code in an >> ASF repo" and "code initially imported" here. Could you elaborate what you >> mean?... > I'm not sure why Emmanuel mentions IP clearance, that's > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ which specifically says "not > for new projects". If Groovy were to import more code later, that > process would apply (and take a bit longer due to the votes required). > > But right now, for the initial code import of the new podling, the > signed Software Grant [1] is sufficient. > > -Bertrand