groovy-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <>
Subject Re: New Workflow…
Date Tue, 28 Apr 2015 07:29:12 GMT
Le 27/04/15 22:49, Russel Winder a écrit :
> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 13:52 +0200, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> […]
>> Details is what matters when in front of a court...
> […]
> I am not a lawyer, but I do expert witness work in the High Court.
> like the above are over-glib and do not properly characterize what happens
> in the legal process. (At least in the UK, I have no experience of the USA
> jurisdictions.) Details may either be important or totally irrelevant, it
> all depends on the case, the context and the barristers.
What is important is that The ASF may be requested to provide the full
history of commits for a project with their origin, and be able to prove
that it has not be dampered. This is possible because we keep a track of
every commit (thanks to SVN/git) with an identified committer.

View raw message