groovy-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From pa...@apache.org
Subject [groovy] branch GROOVY_2_5_X updated: fix typos mostly in comments
Date Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:17:07 GMT
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

paulk pushed a commit to branch GROOVY_2_5_X
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/groovy.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/GROOVY_2_5_X by this push:
     new 70bace0  fix typos mostly in comments
70bace0 is described below

commit 70bace0ee1fa0094b338afe2b5ab7016b5b4c054
Author: Paul King <paulk@asert.com.au>
AuthorDate: Mon Mar 18 09:30:47 2019 +1000

    fix typos mostly in comments
---
 .../antlr2/org/codehaus/groovy/antlr/java/java.g   | 30 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/main/antlr2/org/codehaus/groovy/antlr/java/java.g b/src/main/antlr2/org/codehaus/groovy/antlr/java/java.g
index 96046a5..cfa2607 100644
--- a/src/main/antlr2/org/codehaus/groovy/antlr/java/java.g
+++ b/src/main/antlr2/org/codehaus/groovy/antlr/java/java.g
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ import antlr.LexerSharedInputState;
  *	  Note that the grammar is stricter now; e.g., this(...) must
  *	be the first statement.
  *
- *	  Trinary ?: operator wasn't working as array name:
+ *	  Ternary ?: operator wasn't working as array name:
  *		  (isBig ? bigDigits : digits)[i];
  *
  *	  Checked parser/tree parser on source for
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ import antlr.LexerSharedInputState;
  *	  Changes by Matt Quail to support generics (as per JDK1.5/JSR14)
  *	  Notes:
  *	  o We only allow the "extends" keyword and not the "implements"
- *		keyword, since thats what JSR14 seems to imply.
+ *		keyword, since that's what JSR14 seems to imply.
  *	  o Thanks to Monty Zukowski for his help on the antlr-interest
  *		mail list.
  *	  o Thanks to Alan Eliasen for testing the grammar over his
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ import antlr.LexerSharedInputState;
  *	  Bug fixes as identified by Michael Stahl; clean up of tabs/spaces
  *        and other refactorings
  *	  o Fixed typeParameters omission in identPrimary and newStatement
- *	  o Replaced GT reconcilliation code with simple semantic predicate
+ *	  o Replaced GT reconciliation code with simple semantic predicate
  *	  o Adapted enum/assert keyword checking support from Michael Stahl's java15 grammar
  *	  o Refactored typeDefinition production and field productions to reduce duplication
  *
@@ -565,10 +565,10 @@ annotations  {Token first = LT(1);}
     ;
 
 annotationArguments
-	:	annotationMemberValueInitializer | anntotationMemberValuePairs
+	:	annotationMemberValueInitializer | annotationMemberValuePairs
 	;
 
-anntotationMemberValuePairs
+annotationMemberValuePairs
 	:	annotationMemberValuePair ( COMMA! annotationMemberValuePair )*
 	;
 
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ superClassClause!  {Token first = LT(1);}
 // Definition of a Java class
 classDefinition![AST modifiers] {Token first = LT(1);}
 	:	"class" IDENT
-		// it _might_ have type paramaters
+		// it _might_ have type parameters
 		(tp:typeParameters)?
 		// it _might_ have a superclass...
 		sc:superClassClause
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ classDefinition![AST modifiers] {Token first = LT(1);}
 // Definition of a Java Interface
 interfaceDefinition![AST modifiers]  {Token first = LT(1);}
 	:	"interface" IDENT
-		// it _might_ have type paramaters
+		// it _might_ have type parameters
 		(tp:typeParameters)?
 		// it might extend some other interfaces
 		ie:interfaceExtends
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ enumConstantBlock
 	;
 
 //An enum constant field is just like a class field but without
-//the posibility of a constructor definition or a static initializer
+//the possibility of a constructor definition or a static initializer
 enumConstantField! {Token first = LT(1);}
 	:	mods:modifiers
 		(	td:typeDefinitionInternal[#mods]
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ variableLengthParameterDeclaration!  {Token first = LT(1);}
 
 parameterModifier  {Token first = LT(1);}
 	//final can appear amongst annotations in any order - greedily consume any preceding
-	//annotations to shut nond-eterminism warnings off
+	//annotations to shut non-determinism warnings off
 	:	(options{greedy=true;} : annotation)* (f:"final")? (annotation)*
 		{#parameterModifier = #(create(MODIFIERS,"MODIFIERS",first,LT(1)), #parameterModifier);}
 	;
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ parameterModifier  {Token first = LT(1);}
 // Inside a class definition without "static":
 // it is an instance initializer
 // As the body of a method
-// As a completely indepdent braced block of code inside a method
+// As a completely independent braced block of code inside a method
 // it starts a new scope for variable definitions
 
 compoundStatement
@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ statement
 	// side-effects.
 	|	expression SEMI!
 
-	//TODO: what abour interfaces, enums and annotations
+	//TODO: what about interfaces, enums and annotations
 	// class definition
 	|	m:modifiers! classDefinition[#m]
 
@@ -1282,12 +1282,12 @@ multicatch
 //
 // the last two are not usually on a precedence chart; I put them in
 // to point out that new has a higher precedence than '.', so you
-// can validy use
+// can validly use
 //	 new Frame().show()
 //
 // Note that the above precedence levels map to the rules below...
 // Once you have a precedence chart, writing the appropriate rules as below
-//   is usually very straightfoward
+//   is usually very straightforward
 
 
 
@@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ unaryExpression
 unaryExpressionNotPlusMinus
 	:	BNOT^ unaryExpression
 	|	LNOT^ unaryExpression
-	|	(	// subrule allows option to shut off warnings
+	|	(	// sub-rule allows option to shut off warnings
 			options {
 				// "(int" ambig with postfixExpr due to lack of sequence
 				// info in linear approximate LL(k). It's ok. Shut up.
@@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ identPrimary
 				// off. See below. (The "false" predicate makes it non-issue)
 				warnWhenFollowAmbig=false;
 			}
-			// we have a new nondeterminism because of
+			// we have a new non-determinism because of
 			// typeArguments... only a syntactic predicate will help...
 			// The problem is that this loop here conflicts with
 			// DOT typeArguments "super" in postfixExpression (k=2)


Mime
View raw message