Mailing-List: contact dev-help@gora.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@gora.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALuGr6aD_5w7MEjBDFrAgod+BrwAE2MnPoMhSzMY9B4dzuMiPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGaRif3Lb4pB9TT9mmKMcQeDyyE=PUssqLYL6kcEBtSJvh+2zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALuGr6ZRiKD3QFCCGmLVg5iH33rvxZoD8wkXbWdhT13Q36BZrw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGaRif0vsM+CK-J2NncnK_B8Fspe+5-33hX+uug1tZa_6tsQfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALuGr6aD_5w7MEjBDFrAgod+BrwAE2MnPoMhSzMY9B4dzuMiPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 23:37:12 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGaRif19xtc=zJF=kiF-nnWZny_o57BR5nvtL5e1=dehcnuJyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>
To: "<user@gora.apache.org>" <user@gora.apache.org>
Cc: "<dev@gora.apache.org>" <dev@gora.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c15b50dc4fd3051f3414ca

--001a11c15b50dc4fd3051f3414ca
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Henry,
OK, new release artifacts available. These are identical to the last ones
but with the offending files replaced and new sigs generated.
Do we need to VOTE on these or can we release?
Thanks
Lewis

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am good with that approach
>
>
> On Monday, September 7, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Crap Henry. Your absolutely right. Bugger.
>> These were of course local files I had lying around and have been
>> included!!!
>> Can I remove the files from the artifacts at
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ and simply re-stage them?
>> Thanks for review.
>> Lewis
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for driving the release, Lewis.
>>>
>>> +0 for me
>>>
>>> Checksum files look good
>>> Signature file looks good
>>> LICENCE file looks good
>>> NOTICE file looks good
>>> Source compiled and pass tests.
>>>
>>> But looks like in the source artifact after I unzip from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ I saw extra files:
>>> GORA-262.patch and gora-267.diff
>>>
>>> Those files probably should not be there?
>>>
>>> - Henry
>>>
>>>
>>> - Henry
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney
>>> <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Folks,
>>> > I am very happy to get a VOTE out for Apache Gora 0.6.1 Release
>>> Candidate.
>>> >
>>> > We solved 21 issues: http://s.apache.org/l69
>>> >
>>> > Git source tag (79fba16dc9bf0b1660861a233a218bc669173178):
>>> > http://s.apache.org/gora-0.6.1
>>> >
>>> > Staging repo:
>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegora-1003
>>> >
>>> > Source Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/
>>> >
>>> > PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6 - Lewis John McGibbney):
>>> > http://gora.apache.org/dist/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> > Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that
>>> > contributed to Apache Gora 0.6.1.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
>>> > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
>>> > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain wh
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > P.S. Here is my +1
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Lewis
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Lewis*
>>
>


-- 
*Lewis*

--001a11c15b50dc4fd3051f3414ca--