Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-7651-apmail-gora-dev-archive=gora.apache.org@gora.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-gora-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-gora-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCED418F1C
	for <apmail-gora-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 18724 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2015 21:34:51 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-gora-dev-archive@gora.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18690 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2015 21:34:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@gora.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@gora.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@gora.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@gora.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.gora.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@gora.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@gora.apache.org
Received: (qmail 18619 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2015 21:34:51 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:34:51 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org)
 with ESMTP id 1D9061AA2D3
	for <dev@gora.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.879
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
	SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new);
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
	with ESMTP id FxkENDZlzzJB for <dev@gora.apache.org>;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com
 [209.85.213.173])
	by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with
 ESMTPS id 00C6A428E7
	for <dev@gora.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:34:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igxp17 with SMTP id p17so66514497igx.1
        for <dev@gora.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=DsokHH3ZyseciTlbt1QvVi8ZTaKiS0wkm4YykPyrKlo=;
        b=yFryGkNgDFiig9tuP8OAR3T90cfUjQB4bEX+EgeUr0yjst6tM/E+ykoGRBJpi4ShEI
         3RuIWRVAiDxiSGbwYcH2VcfMyjAOoGWAL4Xpq34eyNgKpqb2z6idM8JNCIa47NeAS6JM
         mEcudheq5XUFffHM98J5/fzE3faH3DRAxhVkr74hYbOkTPUMna0tNLTv1toEiNwCh0fW
         SrUsxu9E5hQY+/AiDMGjkSkI7iK44Q2S22JE91s3EqPpY4oE2XOTlfXn42Sz0iBdWiFW
         qexwG749gFWeQanDR/TKCGv4VlGLxYsAEI0rCilIgt0KtBps07y8kw9qQ/9it+lyEb01
         9xlQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.36.7 with SMTP id m7mr2928420igj.96.1439847289472; Mon,
 17 Aug 2015 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.97.131 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALuGr6ZPHCZ7=F3BJzv0kD0kc3CQC9+paUHRCEqgg-=ELGRfwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHsXEHWNGWUZR5TPZkZrTiy3hiVp_BK+f9TfkQ_oTuyYGT_Psg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALuGr6ZPHCZ7=F3BJzv0kD0kc3CQC9+paUHRCEqgg-=ELGRfwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:34:49 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAHYFERA2NTm9fGVRiJ9K9HhPsR95uepR49kuwt6p6whCAE1O3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unnecessary Variable
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Renato_Marroqu=C3=ADn_Mogrovejo?=
 <renatoj.marroquin@gmail.com>
To: Gora Dev <dev@gora.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c66dc384ddc051d88929c

--089e013c66dc384ddc051d88929c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I think it was this [1], but this was specific to hadoop I think. I think
you could safely pass <false> there, so we can keep it to stay compatible
with Hadoop API.
Just a quick question, how does the HadoopRDD deals with it? does it expose
this parameter? Maybe it's worth checking it out as well.


Renato M.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2399

2015-08-17 14:27 GMT-07:00 Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>:

> I think it was from way back, didn't remember why.
>
> Why do you need to remove it to support Spark?
>
> - Henry
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankamaci@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > There is a method as:
> >
> >     public static void setIOSerializations(Configuration conf, boolean
> > reuseObjects)
> >
> > at GoraMapReduceUtils.java
> >
> > However, reuseObjects is never used at that method. I've removed it at my
> > Spark implementation. Is it necessary for future use?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Furkan KAMACI
>

--089e013c66dc384ddc051d88929c--