Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3348B10787 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53442 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2014 14:25:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 53398 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2014 14:25:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@giraph.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@giraph.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 53378 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2014 14:25:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:25:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ssc.open@googlemail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:25:46 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi5so890538wib.3 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:25:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ufopKw4QDlQvIW3y2RGS4RRzPXRtjzEh1dphZ+4WZYY=; b=mZ8z+rY7JPXK+sXT7YfHbGrn553rq3ig7T0YAfnLhpNe2SRSbsz8iN0HQG/Jam61FZ v8++tir9YZMfMOx1dq6uGXK+Jra7uUGIqHxRKZcOlO+an/QVev+9DFxB5dsmrZlAC6lu nMDSJ5LJR1Xyuwle/rZZdjLAFqLSLXuXmtnk1ORv1bNLG/kGFn44lJ5LCc8RCLg/mnl5 NL0422uU1SpDLHmRqGUHKRVy0jPRf+GQONQcbhXW1rAR3mHak+voG5/k/Ki7LOXs6TbH Fg7ENwvqB4GIdVjRdAqx839ylw1ap5ojNvV0ADQkcKxtYc+sHKOmEa0B00NJWM1o0mBG UTXA== X-Received: by 10.180.9.71 with SMTP id x7mr3948088wia.55.1391783125122; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:25:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (f052165195.adsl.alicedsl.de. [78.52.165.195]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm11109439wjq.0.2014.02.07.06.25.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:25:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F4ECD1.6050305@apache.org> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:25:21 +0100 From: Sebastian Schelter Reply-To: ssc@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@giraph.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance tuning of Giraph on small cluster with Infiniband References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Alexander, how large is the graph that you run your test on in terms of vertices and edges? --sebastian On 02/07/2014 03:11 PM, Alexander Frolov wrote: > Hi, team! > > As I have read in previous threads, I've started evaluation of Giraph on > IB-cluster. So here I want to share my results (in case it will be useful > for anybody) and ask for your ideas of further improving of performance > characteristics. > > Test system: > * 8 Nodes, with dual Intel Xeon CPU E5-2630 (6 cores/CPU), 80GB > * Infiniband FDR Dual-Port 4x > * SUSE 11.2 > * jdk1.7.0_51 > > At the moment I am performing experiment with > SimpleShortestPathsComputation test on generated RMAT graph. I attach plot > wich shows scalability of Giraph up to 32 workers. > > As can be seen from the plot up to 8 workers there is almost linear > scalability and then (from 8 to 32) speed is not going up. For me it seems > strange that using additional cores on nodes wont bring any performance > gain to the execution time. Have anybody meet with such behaviour? > > Next I am going to use threads instead of workers for cores utilization. > Also I am going to switch to the Hadoop-RDMA project. > > > If anybody has any suggestion how I can achieve maximum performance on > Giraph on the cluster, I will be obliged to you ;-) > > Hope for your feedback. > > Best, > Alex >