Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0CFE10A48 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59347 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2013 16:47:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 59309 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2013 16:47:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@giraph.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@giraph.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 59300 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2013 16:47:31 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:47:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO aching-mbp3.local) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username aching, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:47:30 +0000 Message-ID: <526FE68D.4020608@apache.org> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:47:09 -0700 From: Avery Ching User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@giraph.apache.org Subject: Re: Release date for 1.1.0 References:

In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070800080800010601080605" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070800080800010601080605 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I would like that as well. Does someone else want to coordinate this one? =) Avery On 10/29/13 6:15 AM, Claudio Martella wrote: > I actually agree, we should start heading towards 1.1.0 with a plan. > Avery, what do you think? > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ahmet Emre Aladağ > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is there an expected date for 1.1.0? There has been a lot of way > taken since 1.0.0. > > -- > Ahmet Emre Aladağ > > > > > -- > Claudio Martella > claudio.martella@gmail.com --------------070800080800010601080605 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I would like that as well. Does someone else want to coordinate this one? =)

Avery

On 10/29/13 6:15 AM, Claudio Martella wrote:

I actually agree, we should start heading towards 1.1.0 with a plan.
Avery, what do you think?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ahmet Emre Aladağ <aladagemre@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

Is there an expected date for 1.1.0? There has been a lot of way taken since 1.0.0.

--
Ahmet Emre Aladağ

--
Claudio Martella
claudio.martella@gmail.com

--------------070800080800010601080605--