Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FD709520 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45848 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2012 16:14:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-giraph-user-archive@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 45797 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2012 16:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@giraph.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@giraph.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@giraph.apache.org Received: (qmail 45786 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2012 16:14:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:14:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jghoman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.180] (HELO mail-we0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:14:37 +0000 Received: by weyt11 with SMTP id t11so4412359wey.11 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:14:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=k+CHg6HsUBDk+lnxaVRrtxemtvCrU8Sj12IZiJdhCtk=; b=YChMtP1dCFhKanIQzMPef3yH2MTUbeUpyF7ed5mYpuEzz7/SYcKMxoa04H1UmE+66O onEQHWj+rWvEsc7hEv16//LhG0byCIe7A2UHGTvgtkeS1Bd8bI6Q++jG92t1+RZZh975 EFt6bUtGTY5mA0daG1a9HA2Qf9h7rJnDI34NIx4zaofO0RAopNap9r8nwLCKr39Qk3We MaWwscGJIpnCh7nqIykBgqLKRSK9ShGP7v7lJUGCH5DYZilQHZZLUme2BKI2nG0dYdFH 370RPvaEUGzJzw2Ws0qhRtQkn19flrOqrTixrNuV1mAiP63bIIhJJByYn2boEyJXNCUa 9hsA== Received: by 10.216.211.131 with SMTP id w3mr8378969weo.163.1340036054062; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.106.231 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:13:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1338989622.2336.5.camel@clivelt2> References: <4FCF5413.8080009@googlemail.com> <4FCF56E6.7050203@apache.org> <4FCF5761.3050604@googlemail.com> <1338989622.2336.5.camel@clivelt2> From: Jakob Homan Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:13:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dropping 0.20.x support? To: user@giraph.apache.org, clive.cox@rummblelabs.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org AWS EMR is a pretty good reason to keep 0.20 around. But as soon as they provide more options, I'd like to re-visit this. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Clive Cox wrote: > > I've just started playing with Giraph and also have the issue with > Eclipse and munging, though I've not looked deeply into if there is a > solution. > > I'm using 1.0.3 Hadoop locally but would also like to ensure Giraph says > compatible with AWS ElasticMapReduce which only uses 0.20.x Hadoop at > present. > > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:13 +0200, Paolo Castagna wrote: >> Sebastian Schelter wrote: >> > AFAIK 0.20.x is the current stable version most people run on, so I >> > think it would not be a good idea... >> >> Are those 'most people' using Giraph too? Or, not? >> If they are, they should/could reply to this email and say so. :-) >> >> Paolo >> >> > >> > sebastian >> > >> > >> > >> > On 06.06.2012 14:58, Paolo Castagna wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> (perhaps, a stupid question but...) would it be a problem dropping Giraph >> >> support for Hadoop v0.20.x? >> >> >> >> If this is possible, it might be possible to simplify the all munging situation >> >> and even get rid of it, which would simplify the life for some of developers >> >> and/or users who might want to create and submit a patch using an IDE (such as >> >> Eclipse, for example). >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Paolo >> > >> > >