Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18E709DAF for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68193 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 10:09:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68085 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 10:09:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact giraph-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: giraph-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list giraph-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68063 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2012 10:09:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:09:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of attilacsordas@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:09:21 +0000 Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so3439342wib.6 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:08:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=n7HblqITRXbUSzSOQVnST/eNN9v6/7j89ojTnf4cxJ8=; b=fEkk1qRxO5T9xuWMk+2scyyp/7q2JxGNnIMOAjVKTFciDlpCHsFy/CEepip9QGf0ip 3OtzhdgwTpfVR1jkjKrB0S5lvwyaGNq79uR+7yPOXJG1nG8bwhP5tqA8awN9o9cRFibI BTZvoZjPkM7i+UGhc7+RychFWD5F+aS3nqNVw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.84.105 with SMTP id x9mr2272805wiy.19.1328350139921; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.152.196 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 02:08:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:08:59 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: hadoop-non-secure still supported or not? From: Attila Csordas To: giraph-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044401b03a339b04b8209eeb --f46d044401b03a339b04b8209eeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I've been using Hadoop 0.20.2 for over a year now and like to play with Giraph. Tried to build it with the maven hadoop-non-secure profile but couldn't. Should I have to use >= 0.20.203 even for trying it out locally? Cheers, Attila -- Attila Csordas Bioinformatician European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, UK --f46d044401b03a339b04b8209eeb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

I've been using Hadoop 0.20.2 for over a year no= w and like to play with Giraph.
Tried to build it with the maven = hadoop-non-secure profile but couldn't.

Should I have to use >= ;=3D=A00.20.203 even for trying it out locally?

Cheers,
Attila

=

--
Attila Csordas
Bioinformatician<= br>
European Bioinformatics Institute
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, UK

=A0


--f46d044401b03a339b04b8209eeb--