giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eli Reisman <apache.mail...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][CHANGED] Release Giraph 1.0.0 (rc3)
Date Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:14:09 GMT
My instinct is to immediately say yes but I don't think I should commit to
that right now. I would be happy to be part of the discussion as to ideas,
proposed methods to replace/remove it. But mentoring might spread me too
thin this summer, as you know ;)


On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Claudio Martella <
claudio.martella@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, just to make sure we're on the same page on the munge topic and GSoC,
> I started the bureaucracy for the project, but I won't be able to mentor
> also that project. I plan to mentor the tinkerpop project, in case we get a
> student. In case we get students for both projects, somebody would step in
> for the munge one?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Claudio Martella <
> claudio.martella@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am afraid we're not going to get students this round. We really moved
> at
> > the last minute. On this topic, I sent a couple of emails to master
> > students mailing lists to a couple of universities, but if you guys could
> > also forward some recruiting emails to whom you think would be suitable,
> it
> > would probably help. Maybe also Sebastian can help here at TU Berlin?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Eli Reisman <apache.mailbox@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Thats a good point. It would represent a temporary solution. I'd like to
> >> see us done with munge for all sorts of reasons if its possible. Might
> be
> >> a
> >> difficult student project to complete cleanly though. Any other thoughts
> >> on
> >> this?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Nitay Joffe <nitay@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Just FYI our use of munge does not prevent us from doing binary jar
> >> > release. We can use classifier to release multiple Giraph jars (each
> >> built
> >> > for different Hadoop).
> >> >
> >> > See e.g.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-deploy-plugin/examples/deploying-with-classifiers.html
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3092085/building-same-project-in-maven-with-different-artifactid-based-on-jdk-used
> >> >
> >> > So we would have like giraph-1.0.0-hadoop-0.20.203.0.jar,
> >> > giraph-1.0.0-hadoop-2.0.0.jar, etc
> >> >
> >> > Seems to me like we don't know how long it will take to get rid of
> >> munge.
> >> > Perhaps we should do this as pulling in Giraph into Maven projects
> would
> >> > make it a lot easier for others to work with and lessen the barrier to
> >> > entry?
> >> >
> >> > - Nitay
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 16, 2013, at 1:36 AM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Okay, we're on our 3rd RC now, mainly to incorporate Roman's
> >> suggestion
> >> > about fixing the maven version number from 0.2-SNAPSHOT => 1.0.0.
> Roman,
> >> > this is a source code release, we can't really deploy jars to maven
> >> since
> >> > we use munge to support different versions of Hadoop.  Once we get rid
> >> of
> >> > munge, we'll be able to do this in the future.
> >> > >
> >> > > Release notes:
> >> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~aching/giraph-1.0.0-RC3/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >> > >
> >> > > Release artifacts:
> >> > > http://people.apache.org/~aching/giraph-1.0.0-RC3/
> >> > >
> >> > > Corresponding git tag:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=giraph.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/release-1.0.0-RC3
> >> > >
> >> > > Signing keys:
> >> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Thusday 4pm PST.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for everyone's input!
> >> > >
> >> > > Avery
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >    Claudio Martella
> >    claudio.martella@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
>    Claudio Martella
>    claudio.martella@gmail.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message