giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eli Reisman <apache.mail...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: our git repo
Date Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:38:03 GMT
I'll check again, didn't see one that night, there was a 0.1 branch before
that showed up with git branch -a


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Nitay <nitayj@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think there is a tag for it.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Isn't there a branch-0.1?  I see it in my git.
> >
> >
> > On 3/29/13 5:29 PM, Eli Reisman wrote:
> >
> >> Avery, you know where our 0.1 release branch went to?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>  So the tricky part is that you have to be careful about how you push to
> >>> our git repo, or else you create a new remote branch automatically.
> >>>
> >>> Here's how I do it.
> >>>
> >>> git push origin <local branch name>:trunk
> >>>
> >>> I'm sure there are other ways, but if you forget ":trunk", hello new
> >>> branch!
> >>>
> >>> Avery
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 3/28/13 3:16 PM, Eli Reisman wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Hey folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> I notice on the branches of our git repo, we have a bunch of wierd
> temp
> >>>> branches again (were those commits meant for trunk? did they get into
> >>>> trunk?) and we are now missing or 0.1 release branch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Is all this intentional? Whats the deal with the new branches?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Eli
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message