giraph-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eli Reisman <apache.mail...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][CHANGED] Release Giraph 1.0.0 (rc3)
Date Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:28:58 GMT
it builds fine for me on trunk "mvn clean install"



On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Eli Reisman <apache.mailbox@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm building it from trunk pull right now
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Avery,
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Avery Ching <aching@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > The md5sum I computed was of the giraph-1.0.0.tar.gz.
>> >
>> > How stupid of me. Thanks for th attention to detail. This is good now.
>>
>>
>> > Did you compile from the parent directory?  Or directly from
>> > giraph-examples?  It works fine for me from the parent directory.
>> >
>>
>> I tried to compile from the parent directory. I can later once I get a
>> chance. Can someone else please verify if they can compile, package and
>> therefore unit test Giraph?
>>
>>
>> > Does the NOTICE require us to roll another RC?  Anyone know?
>> >
>>
>> Generally speaking, no I don't think that this is a blocker at all. I
>> would
>> however ask that one of you guys makes the trivial commit to the file
>> within the next development drive.
>>
>> With regards to my comments on the trademarks stuff, again I would not say
>> that this is a blocker but I think we should address it non-the-less
>> (possibly once trademarks@ has reviewed the documentation and
>> commented?).
>>
>> Lewis
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message